Redefining Teacher Roles in AI-driven Informal English Learning: Perspectives from Vietnamese EFL Educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.886-
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
This exploratory mixed-methods study investigates Vietnamese EFL educators’ perceptions of AI-driven informal English learning by examining their attitudes toward students’ AI-mediated learning, perceived changes in pedagogical roles, professional challenges, and institutional support needs. Drawing on survey data from a sample of 36 Vietnamese EFL teachers across diverse educational contexts, the study examines attitudes toward AI-mediated informal learning, perceived shifts in pedagogical responsibilities, professional challenges, and institutional support needs. Quantitative findings reveal that the majority of educators recognize the value of AI tools in enhancing students’ motivation and autonomous learning, while also acknowledging a clear shift toward facilitative rather than directive teaching roles. Educators express strong consensus that critical guidance, specific professional training, and institutional support are essential for navigating AI-driven informal learning contexts effectively. Qualitative narrative responses further illuminate the nuanced experiences, challenges, and adaptive practices of educators engaging with students who independently use AI tools. Findings highlight teachers’ recognition of the need to facilitate, complement, and critically guide students’ AI-mediated informal learning processes. While findings are based on a convenience sample and should not be generalized beyond the study population, they provide preliminary insights into how Vietnamese educators are beginning to conceptualize and respond to AI-driven informal language learning. Implications for teacher education and professional development are discussed, emphasizing the preparation of educators for effective engagement with AI-driven language learning contexts.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Creely, E. (2024). Exploring the role of generative AI in enhancing language learning: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(3), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022495
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2020). “If you don’t improve, what’s the point?” Investigating the impact of a “flipped” online exchange in teacher education. ReCALL, 32(1), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000107
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Riding the digital wilds: Learner autonomy and informal language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44667
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Hampel, R. (2015). Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Springer.
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580
Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: The effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.889714
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000192
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
TESOL International Association. (2025). TESOL position statement: AI for the ELT profession. https://www.tesol.org/news/tesol-position-statement-ai-for-the-elt-profession/
Tran, T., Nguyen, C. H., & Nguyen, L. T. M. (Eds.). (2022). Educational innovation in Vietnam: Opportunities and challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202424
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.70725/307718pkpjuu
Weller, M. (2012). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
Zheng, C., & Wang, Y. (2026). Generative AI in EFL contexts: Q-methodological analysis of cognitive dissonance patterns and self-regulation strategies among Chinese tertiary learners. Acta Psychologica, 264, Article 106531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106531
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vietnam Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








