A Governance Framework for Operationalising Responsible AI Use in Students’ Research Projects: Illustrations from Viet Nam

Authors

  • Dao Mai Thi Tran Pham Van Dong University, Quang Ngai Province, Viet Nam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.910

How to Cite

Tran, D. M. T. (2026). A Governance Framework for Operationalising Responsible AI Use in Students’ Research Projects: Illustrations from Viet Nam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.910

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in students’ research projects for literature searching, idea development, drafting, language editing, information processing, and research planning. These uses can support research learning, but they also raise academic integrity concerns, including unverifiable sources, fabricated references, undeclared AI assistance, over-reliance on AI-generated outputs, unclear authorship, and unfair assessment. This conceptual paper argues that responsible AI use in students’ research projects cannot be secured through individual AI literacy or general guidance alone. Higher education institutions also need governance mechanisms that make AI use transparent, verifiable, assessable, and accountable. Using targeted literature identification and structured conceptual synthesis, the paper maps recurring governance problems to normative principles, institutional requirements, and operational mechanisms. It proposes a five-component framework corresponding to five governance functions: policy (boundary setting), transparency (traceability), assessment (evaluability), audit (assurance), and guidance/support (capability building). Viet Nam is used as an illustrative emerging AI governance context, where national policy directions on digital competence and AI are developing but operational mechanisms for student research remain under-specified. The framework and associated tools are presented as adaptable design artefacts for future institutional testing rather than as validated interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: Why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(7), 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Do, H. V., Bui, T. T., Tran, D. H., Nguyen, H. T., & Dinh, L. D. (2026). Developing and validating an AI literacy scale for university students in Viet Nam. IFLA Journal, 52(2), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251385058

Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1

European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Gonsalves, C. (2025). Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: Implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 592-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654

Le, T. P., Do, D. K., Hoang, H. D., & Nguyen, X. H. (2025). AI tools as facilitators or threats to Vietnamese students’ academic integrity in research writing. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(2), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.251623

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 598, pp. 1-16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the originality of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963

Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835

Ministry of Education and Training (2025a). Quyết định số 1504/QĐ-BGDĐT ngày 27/5/2025 ban hành Chương trình phổ cập kiến thức, kĩ năng số cho sinh viên trong các cơ sở giáo dục đại học [Decision No. 1504/QĐ-BGDĐT dated May 27, 2025 promulgating the digital literacy and skills development programme for students in higher education institutions].

Ministry of Education and Training (2025b). Thông tư số 02/2025/TT-BGDĐT ngày 24/01/2025 quy định Khung năng lực số cho người học [Circular No. 02/2025/TT-BGDĐT dated January 24, 2025 regulating the digital competency framework for learners].

Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, Article 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Ngo, C.-L., Tran, T. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of generative AI: Perceptions and responses of Vietnamese EFL teachers. Teaching English with Technology, 24(1), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.56297/FSYB3031/MXNB7567

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Prime Minister of Viet Nam. (2021). Quyết định số 127/QĐ-TTg ngày 26/01/2021 ban hành Chiến lược quốc gia về nghiên cứu, phát triển và ứng dụng Trí tuệ nhân tạo đến năm 2030 [Decision No. 127/QĐ-TTg dated January 26, 2021 promulgating the national strategy on research, development, and application of artificial intelligence through 2030].

UNICEF Viet Nam (2025, May 30). Viet Nam National Forum on Artificial Intelligence in Education [Press release] https://www.unicef.org/vietnam/press-releases/viet-nam-national-forum-artificial-intelligence-education

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Tran, D. M. T. (2026). A Governance Framework for Operationalising Responsible AI Use in Students’ Research Projects: Illustrations from Viet Nam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2026.910

Issue

Section

REVIEW ARTICLES